The Democrats may be the first political party in history to have made emasculation a central part of their appeal to male voters.
And what could better symbolise their elevation of male impotence than the offer of free vasectomies to male attendees at the Democratic National Convention last week?
So-called “reproductive rights” were a central issue at the Convention. In case attendees were in any doubt about this, there was a giant inflatable intra-uterine device just outside the Convention center, for all to see.
Beyond that, in a nearby parking lot, sat a Planned Parenthood RV, where on the Monday of the conference, men could book a free vasectomy. The next day, the mobile clinic offered free abortions. Anti-abortion protesters were kept away by fences and a ring of police, but there were no protests to stop the ten men who volunteered to be sterilised for the good of the cause.
Literal emasculation is now a political gesture, no different from “taking the knee” or gleefully announcing your pronouns to everyone you meet. In the aftermath of the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, there was a significant increase in the number of men seeking vasectomies. According to The Guardian, daily web searches for “Where can I get a vasectomy?” increased by 850% when the draft Dobbs decision was released in May 2022.
“In the current climate,” The Guardian told us, a vasectomy is “a way for men to take a more active stake in big decisions about contraception and reproduction that typically fall to women.”
Having your tubes cut, as a man, and stopping the flow of semen is a gesture of solidarity with women whose reproductive rights are under threat from the Orange Man and his evil acolytes on the Supreme Court—Judges Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito.
It would be easy enough to dismiss the vasectomy bus as a stunt. After all, only ten men used it, a tiny fraction of the men who actually attended the Convention. And despite the rise in vasectomies after the Dobbs decision, it’s not as if libtards are going out, en masse, and sterilising themselves like a pack of lemmings—however much we might wish they would. It would certainly make things easier if they didn’t reproduce.
But it’s not a stunt. The Democrats really have made emasculation a central part of their appeal to men. The party’s messaging at the conference was loud and clear: Democrat men are different from Republican men, and one of the most important ways they’re different is in their testosterone levels. You see, Democrat men have lower testosterone than Republican men—but that’s actually a good thing. It’s good because it means, most of all, that Democrat men are willing to accept a leader, and a president, who isn’t a man—Kamala Harris.
I’m not reading between the lines here or putting words in anybody’s mouth. Dana Bash actually said this at the conference. Here’s what she said.
The Democrats, she said, are “trying to put forward male figures—Tim Walz being one of them, Doug Emhoff last night—who can speak to men out there who might not be the testosterone-laden, gun-toting kind of guy who wants to listen to Hulk Hogan and the kind of players that came out of the RNC; but also, in addition, understand that it’s okay in 2024 to be a man comfortable in his own skin who supports a woman. And that’s something that they’re really trying to work on with male voters beyond the base.”
Hulk Hogan, if you remember, performed his signature shirt-rip at the Republican National Convention, revealing a Trump-Vance t-shirt underneath. “LET TRUMPAMANIA RUN WILD, BROTHER!” he bellowed, summoning the intensity of the Hulkster in his glorious prime. My testosterone levels increased just watching it. I could actually feel the hair growing on my chest. It was a truly surreal moment, possible only in a nation as big, bad and bold as America, however much its badness and boldness have been diminished in recent years.
What a difference two years makes. That’s how long it’s been since the Tucker Carlson documentary The End of Men, in which I played a starring role alongside Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and a host of my fellow “right-wing bodybuilders” from Twitter. The documentary focused on the catastrophic decline in male fertility parameters—sperm counts and testosterone—over the last fifty years, and its devastating downstream effects on American life. The documentary made it absolutely clear that the health of the nation is a real political issue, and that high testosterone, in particular, is key to having a nation full of strong, motivated, capable men. And that’s what we want, surely?
America was once a nation of men with chests, to paraphrase C.S. Lewis, and it can be again. But for America to be a land of Chads doing Chad things, we need to improve the food supply, clean up the environment and reduce people’s exposure to toxic endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and we need to get boys and men up off their backsides, out of their bedrooms and gooncaves, and back in the saddle, on the wrestling mat, up the climbing wall and in the gym.
Liberal talking-heads, politicians and the mainstream media reacted to The End of Men with a mixture of incredulity, ridicule and a certain amount of anger too. One of the principal responses was to suggest that men who spend their time with other men, doing traditionally manly stuff, away from women, are actually gay. How original! I call this the “Brokeback Mountain theory of masculinity.” It has already been used to discredit cowboys—America’s most famous masculine archetype—as closet homosexuals, and it’s used widely today whenever even the merest whiff of testosterone is detected by leftists.
The naysayers and namecallers were quite clear that testosterone is not a political issue at all. If testosterone has been declining it doesn’t matter. There are no implications we should be worried about. It’s ephemeral.
Except now it’s not. Now, we’re told, testosterone decline is essential to realising a more equitable vision of America. The Kamunist vision of America.
This isn’t just an appeal: it’s also a prophecy or prediction. The Democrat party doesn’t just want to attract men who don’t—how shall we say?—conform to traditional masculine stereotypes: it also wants to show us what the future is going to look like for men. And what it really means to do is show us the future for white men, who are still the majority of America’s men—for now.
To see that future, we only have to look at Tim Walz.
Last weekend I talked at length about Walz, and how his “bumbling white dad” minstrel routine is actually a sinister vision of a future white majority-minority America.
As I noted, “The Walz minstrel act is not just an act. It’s a prophecy. By huffing and puffing and blustering and poking fun at himself because he doesn’t add “flavor” to his food, Walz is showing white Americans the future they can expect. The future he will have helped create. A laughing stock. A pathetic sideshow in their own nation.”
In ancient Greece, slaves were prevented from using the public gymnasia to exercise. Why? Because the rulers and citizens of the ancient Greek city-states didn’t want them to develop what they called thymos. Thymos is a pretty good proxy for testosterone: the desires and virtues that drive men to compete and to conquer. If slaves developed thymos, they might get ideas. Worst of all, they might decide not to be slaves anymore. Remember: the slave population in ancient Athens was over 25% of the population at times.
Frankly, I welcome this honesty from the Democrats. I’ve been saying it for some time and been labelled a “right-wing conspiracy theorist” for my troubles, but now I can just point and say, “Look, they said it themselves”: if you’re a man, the price of admission to the leftist utopia is submission. Go forward, willing slaves, into the light.
Top Economist Martin Armstrong’s Computer Warns 2024 Will Probably Be Our Last Election
