Image Credit: Jim Vondruska / Stringer / Getty Images 
We’ve learned more in the past week about Thomas Matthew Crooks—the weird little prick who tried to kill Donald Trump—than in the past 17 months, and it’s almost entirely thanks to the efforts of one man: Tucker Carlson.
Tucker released a 30-minute documentary on X last week that exploded the official narrative about Crooks, as told to us by those ever-so-reliable, oh-so-trustworthy men in black at the Federal Bureau of Obfuscation… sorry, the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The FBI told the public and Congress that Crooks was a “virtual ghost online with no presence at all.” They said Crooks was apolitical, and that no clear motive for his attempt on Donald Trump’s life was forthcoming. Crooks had no history of violence either, apparently.
All of this was lies—or selective presentation or omission or maybe it was plain old incompetence and they just couldn’t get their facts straight; although I seriously doubt that. Whatever it was, we know the outcome. For 17 months, the story died. Someone tried to blow Donald Trump’s head off on stage, for the whole word to see, and came within millimeters of doing it—the biggest fucking story in the world—and there was simply nothing to say, nothing to report, no leads to be followed, no conclusions to be drawn.
Until now.
If you haven’t already, go to X and watch the documentary for yourself. It’s vintage Tucker, a reminder of why he’s still an essential voice on the American right, even if you don’t like those little tobacco pouches or agree with everyone he interviews—and, frankly, why the hell should you?
Today, another puzzle piece landed in our laps. It’s something Tucker didn’t mention in the documentary, but that doesn’t make it supplemental in any way. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Thomas Matthew Crooks had gender dysphoria and a hard-on for furries.
Somewhat buried in a New York Post article about Crooks is the revelation that he had an account on the fetish-art website DeviantArt—where people post drawings of humanoid wolves doing unspeakable things to each other—and referred to himself as a they/them.
As funny as it might sound, this could explain everything; or rather, it could answer two vital questions Tucker raised but didn’t answer.
First of all, the tranny revelation could explain why Thomas Matthew Crooks changed his tune so dramatically between the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020. As Tucker showed using evidence from comments left by Crooks on YouTube videos, the pimple-faced would-be assassin went from preaching the gospel of “behead all libtards” to calling Donald Trump a stupid idiot at the head of a cult of “brainwashed, dumb and racist” supporters. That’s quite the turnaround, and it happened in a matter of a few months.
Clearly, what we need is some kind of trigger, and obviously it has to be something super-mundane. People don’t go 180 on their political views when their hamster dies or another month passes without gameplay footage of the new Grand Theft Auto.
Could Thomas Matthew Crooks have “discovered,” suddenly, that he was “non-binary” and sexually attracted to anthropomorphic canines? Could this have set him off along the path to wanting to kill Donald Trump?
Yes and yes again.
We saw such a Damascene moment in the case of Aaron Bushnell, the poor deluded fool who set himself on fire outside the Israeli Embassy in protest against the war in Gaza. His Reddit-posting history reveals that within a matter of years, probably months actually, he went from an earnest patriotic Christian to a self-hating ethnomasochist who believed the only way to expunge the Original Sin of being born a white male American was to offer his life for the cause of Turd World liberation. In Bushnell’s case, the trigger appears to have been realising he was actually a woman.
Something similar also happened to Tyler Robinson, the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk, who had a transgender boyfriend and a furry obsession too. I’ll come back to him later.
The second question. This concerns whether Crooks was, in some sense, recruited or indoctrinated by others, and whether there could be a link to particular organizations or even to government agencies.
Now, here I’m on less stable ground. I’m just thinking out loud. But what if part of the reason the FBI has held back what it really knows about Crooks is because the agency is directly complicit in his actions?
We’ve suspected this all along, with good reason, since the whole Butler debacle was exactly that: a shocking catalogue of errors by the people tasked with protecting a former president on the campaign trail. I don’t need to rehearse everything that went wrong on that fateful day, because you’re probably well aware of most if not all of it. The scale of the failures—error after oversight after lapse of judgment—is so great it’s hard to discount the possibility of deliberate intent. Malice aforethought, I mean.
And it’s made all the harder to do, because we know just how much hatred there is of Trump in the FBI and other government agencies, from individual agents all the way up to the top brass and people like Christopher Wray, the FBI’s former director.
Back in February, Chris Rufo revealed that the National Security Agency had been infiltrated and compromised to a frightening degree by radical leftists and transgender activists. He presented us with sordid details of their “secret sex chatroom” where they talked about “genital surgeries, trans fetishes, and sexual activities.”
Rufo also spoke to a whistleblower from the NSA who told him how trans activists had entrenched themselves in the agency, pressuring employees to undergo “reeducation” and compromising national security “in the name of ideology.”
“There is a very small number of them,” the whistleblower said, “but they wield an enormous amount of power.
“And outside of the sick stuff, you also see a prevalent Marxist philosophy going on with these people in their chat rooms. They hate capitalism. They hate Christians. They’re always espousing socialist and Marxist beliefs.”
I’m not saying a secret cell of Trump-hating trannies within the FBI or some other three-letter agency groomed Crooks and made him think he should kill Donald Trump, but let’s be honest: It’s not beyond the realms of possibility. Not with everything that’s happened and everything we know.
We know, for example, that Crooks attended a gun range that was also attended by employees from the Department of Homeland Security, and we also know the FBI refuses to release any of the footage from the range that would show what he was doing and who he was there with.
Why not?
I certainly believe Tucker’s broader contention, which is that the FBI has hidden this information because it doesn’t want to expose itself to further blame in the matter. Whether that’s because they missed a whole trail of clues they should have picked up on, allowing them to nip Crooks’s violent plans in the bud, or whether it’s something much more sinister than that, I simply don’t know.
At the very least, it should be clear now for all to see, as I’ve been warning since Trump returned to office, that America has a problem with radical transgender killers. The man who tried to kill Scott Bessent in February—oh, you forgot about him?—he was transgender. His name was Ryan Michael English, and he had a whole list of targets to kill and burn down, including the Heritage Foundation, which is currently doing a great job of burning itself down. Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk’s alleged murderer, had a transgender boyfriend and a depraved, costumed sex life. Then there’s the Zizian death cult wreaking havoc on both coasts. They’ve killed at least six people, including a Border Patrol officer. And now Thomas Matthew Crooks.
It’s high time the Trump administration took they/them seriously.
For more cutting-edge political analysis, health and nutrition advice, fitness programs and more, visit Raw Egg Nationalist’s Substack page In the Raw.
