Image Credit: feri ferdinan / Getty 
(LifeSiteNews) — Six-year-old twins were removed by child protective services from the home of a 74-year-old San Francisco man after police found the boys locked in a “human-size cage.” The elderly man had obtained the boys through surrogacy.
The boys’ loft bedroom “is enclosed by walls on three sides and by metal bars and a gate on the other,” according to a report by The San Francisco Standard.
The man insisted that the contrivance is not a cage but a means to keep the boys safe since one of the twins is neurodivergent, throws furious tantrums, and has previously run out of the apartment.
The outlet also described the deplorable condition of the elderly man’s apartment:
Piles of old mail and packaging covered the dining table. Saltine boxes towered above a wooden kitchen island. Clothing overflowed from a crib. Narrow pathways snaked through the piles, bags of books, cardboard boxes, stacks of paper, toys, and pillows. In a loft, behind floor-to-ceiling metal bars and a metal gate, Cheerios and Starburst wrappers were scattered across the floor. The carpeting on the stairs was stained and dirty. A stale, sweet smell permeated the space.
“I just do not have time or energy to keep up with the housekeeping,” the man told The San Francisco Standard, adding, “I underestimated the work that is involved in raising children.”
The experience of the two young boys trapped in an elderly hoarder’s hovel adds to the mounting evidence revealing how the surrogacy industry caters to anyone with money without regard to their fitness as future parents.
A chorus of outrage erupted on social media late last month after it was revealed that a homosexual registered sex offender who had been convicted of sexual abuse of young teen male was able to obtain an infant boy through surrogacy.
One pro-life commentator wondered, “When are we going to put the rights and well-being of children FIRST and ban surrogacy??”
Engineering children for gay granddads
Nearly a dozen years ago, I wrote about how the unregulated, burgeoning surrogacy industry was a threat to the happiness and thriving of children it creates:
While this nation’s adoption industry has been heavily regulated – and rightfully so – the engineering of children through the purchase of gametes and the rental of wombs remains the wild, wild west. In some states, anything goes.
Any infertile couple working with a reputable adoption agency knows that the window of opportunity for adopting newborns closes as you approach 40 years of age. After that, you’re cut off and must start considering adopting older children. In fact, agencies prefer that there be a comfortable distance between you and the big four-oh.
But for white gay males, there are no rules, only endless options for accessorizing their lives with human beings they have the means to acquire. They choose to purchase children because they are unwilling to create children in the natural way, and are unwilling to commit to a woman in order to form a family to nurture children.
So now we have a growing population of children who must pay the price for their Two Dads’ neglected functionality, or perhaps dysfunctionality, by forgoing a mom. Creating children is the most natural thing in the world, except for gays and lesbians, who disqualify themselves from nature’s ample provision for procreation.
…
Desperation to maintain the image of youthfulness comes in many forms, and it supports a multibillion-dollar industry in this country: Botox, plastic surgery, liposuction, gym memberships. Now we can supplement the list with kids, whose presence gives the aura of youthful vitality to aging gays – an aura supplied by commodified children. Unlike a sporty red Miata that can be purchased either from a showroom or out of the classifieds, children are human beings, and it matters a lot how they come into the world.
Since then, the situation has only deteriorated.
“Last year, data obtained from the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service under freedom of information laws revealed that almost 300 men aged over 50 had applied to become the legal father of a surrogate child over the past five years in the U.K. – and 43 of them were over 60,” The Times (U.K.) social affairs correspondent Sanchez Manning recently noted.
Sir Elton John was 63 years old when his first child was born through surrogacy and 65 at the birth of his second. His partner, David Furnish, was 48 and 50. When their younger child graduates from high school, they will be 81 and 68. At his college graduation, they’ll be 85 and 72, if in fact they are still alive.
In 2012, world-famous American-born fashion designer, homosexual Tom Ford, decided he wanted to have a child. He was 51 years old and his longtime partner, Richard Buckley, was 64. Buckley died less than 10 years later at age 73.
President Donald Trump’s Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, age 62, and his “husband,” John Freeman, also have two young children obtained through surrogacy.
Rich, white homosexual males have endless options for accessorizing their lives with human beings they have the means to acquire. Their stories are plastered all over the tabloids.
These men have chosen to purchase children because they are unwilling to create children in the natural way and are unwilling to commit to a woman for a lifetime in order to form a family to nurture children.
Females are valuable only for supplying eggs and womb-rentals. Their role as mothers have been rendered inconsequential. Women are nothing more than “Breeders.”
And the trend extends far beyond homosexual men to elderly married couples.
Earlier this year, a 72-year-old couple in the U.K. became the legal parents of a baby that they had procured through surrogacy using the husband’s sperm and a donor egg.
Children deserve biological parents – a mom and a dad – and not to be raised by men and women who are old enough to be their grandparents or great-grandparents.
